Press statement by Kua Kia Soong, SUARAM Adviser 29 June 2018

The announcement by Education Minister Maszlee Malik to halt the construction of eight Chinese primary schools (SJKCs) that had already been approved by the previous administration because of supposed financial constraints is totally unacceptable. Is this his own opinion or is this a Cabinet decision? In a government committed to inclusion and transparency what possible rationale could there be for putting the brakes on such a small yet critically important project?

The Debatable Size of our Debt Hole

Ever since the announcement by the new government that our national debt stands at RM1 trillion rather than RM685 billion, we have watched the ritual of “patriotic” Malaysians dutifully contributing to this fund. Even a little boy’s piggy bank was sacrificed at this new altar of “hope”!

 First, there is dispute between economists as to the actual size of the national debt depending on whether we include government guarantees and lease payments under public-private partnerships. We should hear what the former Governor of Bank Negara, Dr. Ungku Zeti Akhtar thinks about whether she included these items during her term as Governor of BNM and especially during Dr Mahathir’s term from 1981 to 2003.

Then, it is clear that two important issues need clarifying, (i) how will such a ‘Save Malaysia Fund’ be utilised? and (ii) who are best positioned to lead this noble drive to “save Malaysia”? A little boy sacrificing his piggy bank to plug the national debt hole is certainly heart-wrenching if ludicrous spectacle.

During the election campaign, Pakatan Harapan made it very clear that they could solve the economic problems of Malaysia as long as they were in charge and the country could be saved from the rotten BN government. After the GE14, the new Finance Minister reiterated the fact that the new government can solve all the accounting problems despite the abolition of GST. Just recently, they could pull RM40million out of the hat to pay for televising the World Cup.

Then again, surely the wealthiest persons in the Council of Elders can easily contribute towards plugging this debt hole rather than let the little boy sacrifice his piggy bank? But whoever heard of the world’s wealthiest persons contributing to plug their country’s national debt? Most of these occasional philanthropists employ smart accountants to evade the local taxes and to invest in offshore tax havens never mind contribute to plugging a national debt hole!

So unless the new government specifies the specific purpose of this so-called “Save Malaysia Fund”, who knows how it will be spent? This is Transparency 101.

Must approved new Chinese schools be sacrificed?

Now the new Education Minister tells us that even the eight Chinese schools approved by the previous administration will have to be sacrificed at the altar of this debt mountain. For the benefit of those Malaysians who are not aware, let’s look at the facts of the matter starting with the statistics on the number of schools in the country. At Independence in 1957, there already existed 1350 Chinese primary schools to serve a Chinese population of 2.3million. Yet today there are only 1298 such schools to serve the current Chinese population of 6.5 million as well as the families of the nearly 100,000 non-Chinese enrolled pupils. With is a total of nearly 8000 primary schools in the country, the glaring need for new Chinese primary schools has never been more urgent, a need that has been voiced by the community ever since the Sixties.

I suggest the new Education Minister and the Prime Minister visit some of our Chinese primary schools to understand the appalling conditions of over-crowded classrooms which cannot be beneficial for our children’s education. Perhaps they will see for themselves whether in fact the majority of the Chinese Malaysians are well-off compared to those in SRK schools. During the Eighties, our children were already cooped up fifty to a class. Does the new Education Minister intend to do something about teacher-student ratio in SRJK schools and how will he go about doing this without building new schools or allocating more land for schools’ expansion?

How much does it cost to build one primary school? RM10 million perhaps? So it would cost perhaps RM100 million to build these eight new Chinese primary schools. But as with most of these schools, the Chinese community has ended up subsidising the cost of their construction through fund raising in the community. Perhaps the richest man in Asia and a member of the Council of Elders, Robert Kuok can be coaxed to donate RM100 million to build these eight Chinese primary schools when a little boy can give away all his piggy bank savings to save the country?

Then again, compare this sum with the amount of unpaid PTPTN loans. According to the PTPTN chairman, the monthly collection for PTPTN loans for May 2018 alone dropped by almost RM100 million. The borrowers were apparently adopting a wait-and-see attitude to see if the new government would follow through on its pledge to allow borrowers who earn below RM4,000 to delay repaying their loan. For the benefit of Malaysians who are concerned about saving Malaysia from the debt hole, in 2015, unpaid PTPTN loans totalled RM8.49 billion.

We hope the new government will do the right thing and not sacrifice these new Chinese primary schools which the community has been hoping for decades. For too long, education under the old BN government was politicised. Let the new PH government show that their new government will no longer treat education like a political football and new schools will be built based on the needs of the particular community in the area.

The education of our children should be seen as an investment and not a cost. Many parents have sacrificed their family assets for the sake of their children’s education. The enlightened intellectuals in Pakatan Harapan should ponder this Confucius saying:

“Education breeds confidence. Confidence breeds hope. Hope breeds peace…”


  1. My father, a pioneer batch of the illustrious Language Institute, taught both vernacular Chinese and the national type schools such as High School Batu Pahat. He was a proponent of the vernacular Chinese school education as much as the national type school education.

    He’d always quote Aristotle :
    “The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.”

    It is of utmost importance that the world continuously declares that :
    Everyone has the right to education. [Art. 26 (1) Universal Declaration of Human Rights]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *