BN SHOULD NOT RECOGNISE UEC IN THEIR MANIFESTO

By Kua Kia Soong, SUARAM Adviser, 28 March 2018

Now that Pakatan has vowed to recognize the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) in their GE14 manifesto, it would be ludicrous for BN to follow suit by doing the same in their forthcoming manifesto. They should be reminded that they are the ruling coalition, the same coalition that has run this country for more than sixty years!

No, the BN Government would look less silly if they announced the recognition of the UEC as soon as possible, ie. BEFORE their manifesto is launched.

Continue reading “BN SHOULD NOT RECOGNISE UEC IN THEIR MANIFESTO”

Resolve Child’s Education Restriction or Resign Immediately

Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) is appalled by the inaction of the Ministry of Education in addressing the denial of access to school by the Immigration Department of Malaysia.

Despite the assurance by the Deputy Prime Minister, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi on 11 January 2017[1] that the Ministry of Education would allow children to attend school even while their application is being processed; and the denial by the director-general of Immigration, Mustafar Ali that his department has not issued any circular to this effect[2], more cases where children are denied from attending school due to the circular by the Immigration Department has surfaced[3].

Malaysia have obligations protect and promote the right of the child irrespective of their status and origin. The rights enshrined under Article 28(1)(a) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child requires the Malaysia government to provide primary education for all. There is absolutely no excuse for a child born in the country and raised and cared for by Malaysian parents to be denied equal opportunity solely based on the failure of the Malaysian government in addressing the issue of statelessness in the country.

If the claims by the respective authorities are conclusive, there is no justification for the continued denial of children from attending school. The Ministry of Education MUST issue an immediate circular or order to resolve the matter and implement the policy they promised.

If the ministers or their ministry are unable to provide remedy immediately and put an end to the policy of rejecting stateless children that is seemingly binding school across Malaysia despite their claims, the Ministers in question should resign as they have clearly shown the country that they are unable to control their respective ministries.

In Solidarity

Sevan Doraisamy
Executive Director
SUARAM

[1] http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/dpm-kids-have-blanket-approval-to-attend-school-pending-citizenship-nod#qCGYCQJW9EJU5REj.97

[2] http://www.imi.gov.my/images/fail_kenyataan_media/2018/1_jan/daftar-sekolah.pdf

[3] P Thevasegamani in Klang (http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/in-selangor-another-stateless-child-awaits-citizenship-to-attend-school#Q6lrGkro8q81eXD2.97) & 7 others in Penang (http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2018/01/12/more-stateless-children-turned-away-from-school/)

Immigration Department Violating Child’s Rights to Education

For Immediate Release
10 January 2017

Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) is appalled by the news of Darshana in Seremban [1] and call for immediate action to remedy the situation. It was reported that Darshana despite being of schooling age was not permitted to attend school due to a new policy by the Immigration Department that forbids non-citizen from attending public schools.

It is shocking that every year, the Immigration Department of Malaysia is seemingly granted with broader arbitrary power to restrict the exercise of human rights in Malaysia. On top of the gross violation of human rights that is constantly reported from Immigration Detention Centre; the arbitrary barring of internationally recognized human rights defenders; and the act of preventing Malaysian human rights defenders from leaving the country; the Immigration Department has reached a new height in its power if it is allowed to influence and alter education policy.

On 6th January, the Education Minister, Mahdzir Khalid was reported to have said that stateless children are to be allowed to attend public school even if their application for citizenship under process [2]. It is shocking that a mere enforcement agency was able to overrule a policy made by the Ministry of Education on the issue of access to school and education.

|Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Malaysia have obligations protect and promote the right of the child irrespective of their status and origin. There is absolutely no excuse for a child born in the country and raised and cared for by Malaysian parents to be denied equal opportunity solely based on the failure of the Malaysian government in addressing the issue of statelessness in the country.

The Ministry of Home Affair must answer for the gross human rights violations perpetrated by the Immigration Department. How did the Home Ministry achieve its supposed success in meeting the key performance index in 2017 when an enforcement agency under its care could act in such a manner? How can an enforcement agency under its purview unilaterally overwrite and undermine the policy of another ministry?

SUARAM strongly condemn the human rights violations committed against Darshana and her parents and call for the revocation of the Immigration Department policy which deprive hundreds if not thousands of children from receiving education due to their statelessness. The minimum level promised by the Education Minister is barely tenable as it is and any act of depriving a child of primary education must be condemned without exception.

In Solidarity Sevan Doraisamy Executive Director SUARAM

[1] https://www.thestar.com.my/story/?hl=Adopted-girl-cant-go-to-school&sec=news&id=%7B019F15FE-55E1-4362-BAF8-E9805EB1E8EE%7D

[2] https://www.nst.com.my/news/2017/01/202346/stateless-children-should-not-be-denied-education-education-minister

WHAT’S UEC RECOGNITION GOT TO DO WITH SOVEREIGNTY?

WHAT’S UEC RECOGNITION GOT TO DO WITH SOVEREIGNTY?
By Kua Kia Soong, SUARAM Adviser, 1 April 2016

The litany of reasons given by the government for not recognizing the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) through the years gets more and more bizarre. They used to say that the UEC’s curriculum was not up to the mark. The latest reason is the answer given by the Deputy Education Minister P. Kamalanathan in the Dewan Rakyat who said that the Cabinet in a meeting on Nov 6 last year had decided not to recognise the certificate:

“For now, the government can’t recognise UEC as it is not based on the national curriculum and education philosophy. This is a reality that needs to be accepted as it relates with the nation’s interest and sovereignty.”

He said that out of the 11,332 students who sat for the UEC last year, 3,000 of them also sat for the Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM). Kamalanathan added that only 82,000, or 3.7%, of the total secondary school pupils in Malaysia would be sitting for the UEC.

“FOREIGN SCHOOLS ARE TAKING OVER THE COUNTRY”

This could be the April Fool’s Day headline for a Malaysian newspaper. But indeed international schools using English and other foreign languages have proliferated in our country in recent years. This is from our ‘Economic Transformation Programme’:

“As Malaysia grows into a developed nation, it also needs to increase the number of international schools to accommodate the education needs of the influx of expatriates and returning population. To-date, a total of 81 international schools are in operation nationwide, with the need for international schools will be expected to be concentrated in Greater Kuala Lumpur and growth corridors such as Iskandar Malaysia, located in the state of Johor. This EPP aims to position Malaysia as a destination of choice for parents seeking foreign education for their children. At the same time, this EPP will allow Malaysia to benefit from the foreign exchange income earned from international school student spending…The total enrolment, however, is 33,688 students, which is still below the target of 75,000 students by 2020.”

Now, if this concerted effort to promote foreign schools in Malaysia is not seen to be a threat to national sovereignty, why should the Malaysian Independent Chinese Secondary Schools (MICSS) be seen as a threat to sovereignty?

Malaysian Chinese Secondary Schools have existed since 1923

For those who are unfamiliar to our nation’s history, Chinese Secondary Schools have existed in our country ever since 1923 when Chung Ling School of Penang started its Secondary-level classes. (Kua Kia Soong, ‘The Chinese Schools of Malaysia: A Protean Saga’, 2008:25) At Independence in 1957, there were some 86 Chinese Secondary Schools in Malaya. (Kua Kia Soong edited, ‘Mother Tongue Education of Malaysian Ethnic Minorities’, 1998:72)

It was only after the 1961 Education Act that many of these schools were forced to become English-medium (yes! Not Malay-medium) at the time. Only 14 Chinese Secondary Schools remained as “Independent” schools. It was after the “Independent Schools’ Revival Movement” in the Seventies that the number of MICSS climbed to 60 schools. In 1975, when the MICSS decided to hold its first Unified Examination, the Chinese education leaders were summoned to Parliament by then Education Minister Dr Mahathir and were told in no uncertain terms to cancel the examination “or else…!”

The Chinese education leaders carried on regardless of the consequences and the UEC has been held every year since. To date, there has never been a leak in any UEC examinations and the curriculum and marking of exam scripts are carried out every year with professional precision. Today, more than 400 foreign tertiary institutions around the world recognize the UEC and our MICSS students are found in countries all over the globe, including France, Germany and Russia. Ever since the Eighties, the National University of Singapore has been poaching hundreds of top UEC students not only for their academic excellence but also for their trilingual capabilities in an effort to balance the cultural mix of their Anglophile Singaporeans.

Putrajaya should look East for UEC recognition

The Sarawak Chief Minister Adenan has recently said that the Ministry of Education is stupid not to recognize the Unified Examination Certificate (UEC) of the sixty Malaysian Independent Chinese Secondary Schools (MICSS), a certificate that has been recognized by the top universities in the world since it has led to a brain drain of our talented human resources. Compared to high-tech brainstorming and money-spinning Putrajaya, Adenan in our East Malaysian backwaters has demonstrated to West Malaysians what a savvy and enlightened politician he is. Our West Malaysian dinosaurs certainly have a lot to learn from our Eastern brethren.

How do foreign students get admitted into Malaysian institutions?

We are all aware of the fact that our local public and private higher learning educational institutions enroll students from all over the world. A simple question to the Education Ministry will show that the reason for not recognizing the UEC is completely untenable, namely:

How does a student from Kazakhstan or Bosnia or China gain admission into Malaysian tertiary education institutions when their respective education systems do not follow our national system?

And which aspect of the National Education System is the UEC syllabus alleged to not follow? It cannot be in Maths and Science; nor can it be Geography since the Malaysian education system has almost obliterated Geography from its syllabus. Can it be in History? Is the History syllabus of the UEC not “Malaysian” enough? If that is the case, how can any foreign student from any part of the globe qualify to enroll in a Malaysian tertiary institution since their syllabus cannot be as “Malaysian” as that of the UEC!

Academic accreditation of education institutions and certificates is what the Malaysian Qualifications Authority (MQA) has been set up to do in the first place! One assumes that the government recognizes all foreign educational certificates based on their accreditation by the Malaysian Qualifications Authority (MQA). How else do foreign students gain admission into our institutions of higher learning? Thus, a student from the PRC can enter a Malaysian tertiary institution based on the PRC’s secondary school leaving certificate. One presumes that our MQA, which is amply staffed, would have done an accreditation of the PRC’s relevant certificate.

Suspending a purely professional decision for 40 years!

Thus, if the MQA is a professional accreditation institution without political constrictions, it would spell out in no uncertain terms what its audit of the UEC has concluded. It does not matter if the requirements of the MQA are far more stringent than the National University of Singapore’s – it just has to spell out in no uncertain terms what the results of that audit are! The government cannot simply suspend a purely professional decision for more than forty years!

It should be pointed out at the outset that, in sharp contrast to foreign students, BM and English are compulsory language papers in the UEC and many MICSS schools also run the SPM at the fifth secondary year (The MICSS is a six-year secondary school system). This easily demolishes the myth that MICSS students only study in the Chinese medium.

To be fair to our civil service and local tertiary institutions, if they require SPM credit in BM for UEC holders, that is reasonable. Nevertheless, the academic accreditation of the UEC by MQA is a totally separate matter altogether.

Malaysians should also know that there are hundreds of non-Chinese students in the MICSS and more than 80,000 non-Chinese students in Chinese-medium primary schools of Malaysia. This is in sharp contrast to UiTM which does not admit ANY “non-bumiputeras” into this public institution even though “non-bumiputera” taxpayers have also paid for this institution!

Does UiTM violate national sovereignty? This Bumiputeras-only policy definitely violates the International Convention for the Eradication of Racial Discrimination (ICERD).

Promote integration by recognizing UEC

The truth is that, through the years the UEC has become a political issue since UMNO refuses to recognize the MICSS system because of their mono-lingual agenda, a policy that is holding back creative development of our human resources. Thus, all these years the community has been paying double taxation when, apart from paying income tax, they also financially support this mother tongue education system.

Recognising the UEC will allow MICSS graduates to be admitted into our public tertiary institutions as well as the civil and armed services, which is the stated intention of the government recently. This will help to promote greater integration among Malaysians and also alleviate the financial plight of those MICSS graduates who cannot afford tertiary education in the private colleges or abroad.

DOES A CRITICAL THINKING SOCIETY BAN A COURSE ON MARXISM?

DOES A CRITICAL THINKING SOCIETY BAN A COURSE ON MARXISM?
Press statement by Dr Kua Kia Soong, SUARAM Adviser 29 Feb 2016

The Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 claims to “develop 21st Century skills such as critical and creative thinking” and further laments that our graduates lack critical thinking and communication skills.

How does this noble intention square with the latest pronouncement by the Inspector-general of police Khalid Abu Bakar that he wants to ban a course on Marxism organized by Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM)?

The revival of interest in Marxist analysis

Ever since that most catastrophic crisis of world capitalism in 2008, the revival in interest in Marxist analysis has seen the sales of Das Kapital, Marx’s masterful critique of political economy soar to unprecedented levels. Young people in the West are especially keen to know the source of the capitalist crisis as workers and other tax payers have bailed out the banks to keep the capitalist system going amidst increasing debt, job insecurity and austerity measures.

Recently, as part of its ‘Masters of Money’ series the BBC looked at the ideas of John Maynard Keynes, Friedrich Hayek and finished by looking at the economic ideas of Karl Marx.  The presenter thought there were important insights to be found in Marx, particularly his perspective on the inequality of capitalism and its instability.  She also made the observation that Marx’s description of capitalism is truer now than when it was first made, noting the compulsive nature of the drive for profit within the capitalist system which is also the source of periodic crises.

Marx’s theory of surplus-value expounded in Das Capital is his most revolutionary contribution to economic science as well as the materialist interpretation of history. His discovery of the development trends of the capitalist mode of production also constitutes an exposition of recurrent crises of capitalist development.

Although Marxist analyses are now resurfacing in public dialogues about economy and society especially after perhaps capitalism’s worst crisis since the 1930s, Marx and Marxist thought have always been part of the essential curriculum of Social Science courses in the best universities of the world. This is the case in Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge as well as Moscow and Beijing universities. Marx with Weber and Durkheim were the main social thinkers in the Sociology courses at my university in Manchester where Marx and Engels lived and researched much of their analyses of the capitalist mode of production. When I was teaching Sociology at the National University of Singapore in 1978-79, Marx was also an essential part of the curriculum there. I cannot imagine our Malaysian universities banning Marxist thought and analysis from their curricula.

Thus the bright young thinkers in PSM should be congratulated for initiating the discussion of Marxism and the analysis of our challenging times. Instead of being hailed as the standard bearers of our Education Blueprint vision to develop the 21st century skills of critical and creative thinking, it seems they are being denigrated as the purveyors of subversive teachings.

Just as Einstein’s insight into gravitational waves has just been vindicated, let us not forget his well-known admonition that “no problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” It would be the height of irony and an insult to the government’s Transformation Programme if the content of Malaysia’s Education Blueprint is going to be dictated by the Inspector General of Police…