SUARAM and Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) was informed by a family member of Muhamad Arif bin Abu Semah, detained under the Emergency Ordinance (EO) since 19 March 2011 that he has been tortured badly under detention.

According to the family members and friends, Muhamad Arif has lost a lot of weight and is currently being denied access to his lawyers at the Rawang police station.

Laywer Edward Saw and Muhamad Arif’s family members went to the Rawang police station to meet him earlier today. When they arrived, the police refused to give Edward access to Muhamad Arif they had not received any instructions from IPD Gombak. Edward tried to negotiate with the police officers, but was unsuccessful. He was told to contact the officers from IPD Gombak.

Muhamad Arif’s family members only managed to spend 3 minutes each with him as the police had only allowed two family members in at a time. During one of these sessions, Fuqran, a family friend, was stopped by a plain clothes police officer, asked his identity card, had his hands restrained and was pulled him out of the room. This act shocked the family members present and the police officer disappeared without apology or explanation.

The continuing descent of the PDRM into lawlessness has been graphically demonstrated by the actions of the plain clothes officer who did not properly identify himself and acted with impunity. SUARAM and LFL condemn the brutal behaviour of the police officer and the silence of his fellow officers who did not stop or restrain him at all. This clearly illustrates the fact that the Malaysian police force is in need of an immediate and true reform.

SUARAM and LFL demands that the Inspector General of Police must:

a) Release Muhamad Arif immediately and issue a public apology to him and his family;
b) Take stern action, including criminal prosecution and disciplinary action against the policemen who assaulted and arrested Muhamad Arif and Fuqran;
c) Support the establishment of the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC), to function as an independent, external oversight body to investigate complaints about police personnel and to make the police accountable for their conduct;
d) Stop the unjust practice of arresting and re-arresting under preventive detention laws;
e) undertake to respect the right of the people for unimpeded and free access to lawyers at all times;
f) Require the police especially those in plainclothes to identify themselves and display their authorisation when affecting their powers;
g) Support human rights education and training programmes, with a view of changing the attitudes and methods of law enforcement personnel.

Released by,


May Day 2011: Pekerja Menuntut Akta Gaji Minima

MAY DAY 2011


Perhimpunan Aman di Kuala Lumpur

Tarikh: 1 Mei 2011 Masa: 10.30 pagi

Berkumpul di Monorail Chow Kit

Salam Perjuangan!

Semua sedia maklum, rakyat Malaysia sentiasa ditekan dengan kenaikan harga barangan komoditi asas. Setiap hari ada sahaja berita kenaikan harga barangan. Tetapi gaji pekerja pula langsung tidak naik walaupun sudah berkerja untuk berpuluh-puluh tahun. Lebih menyakitkan lagi, kerajaan Malaysia masih enggan melaksanakan Akta Gaji Minima untuk semua pekerja di Malaysia.

Oleh itu, Jawatankuasa Mei 1, akan menganjurkan satu perhimpunan aman bersempena Hari Pekerja 2011 untuk menyuarakan tuntutan pekerja, Melaksanakan AKTA GAJI MINIMA di Malaysia sekarang!

Bersatulah pekerja Malaysia untuk menuntut hak kita. Hanya ada masa 24 HARI LAGI untuk sambutan Mei 1. Sebarkan maklumat ini kepada rakan-rakan. Mobilisasi dan turun ramai-ramai.

Tarikh: 1 Mei 2011
Tempat: Kuala Lumpur
Masa: 10.30pagi
Untuk maklumat lanjut, sila hubungi: Bawani.ks 0169008202

Legal Challenge on Taib Mahmud’s Abuse of Power on Immigration Control

Joint Press Statement

Legal Challenge on Taib Mahmud’s Abuse of Power on Immigration Control

We, the undersigned civil society groups, condemn in the strongest sense the denial of electoral reform activist cum political scientist Dr Wong Chin Huat’s entry into Sarawak last Friday.
It is a blatant abuse of immigration power and an insult to Sarawak’s 18-Point Agreement upon the formation of Malaysia by the Sarawak’s caretaker Chief Minister Taib Mahmud.

This and the earlier barring of native rights activist Steven Ng, on the April 3, must be challenged legally in the court. We support fully such legal action, which is now being prepared, to protect Malaysians from violation of fundamental human rights and abuse of federalism.

Wong, Ng and others who have been barred earlier like Dr Kua Kia Soong, MP Sivarasa Rasiah, Cynthia Gabriel and Tan Seng Hin, have all been served a simple notice citing Sub-section 65(1)(a) of the Immigration Act which only states that the State Government has instructed the Director of Immigration Sarawak to deny their entry, without giving any reason.
Caretaker CM Taib Mahmud has shown complete contempt of the Section 67 of the Immigration Act which specifically provides for a citizen’s right of “entering the East Malaysian State for the sole purpose of engaging in legitimate political activity”.

Dr Wong’s trip to Sarawak was to observe the state elections and convey to the Sarawakian electorate two important messages: (a) that some 200,000 Sarawakians living outside Sarawak should have the right to vote via postal ballots – a demand which has been ignored by the Election Commission; (b) that bribery in elections is an criminal offence which may bring the maximum penalty of 2 years in imprisonment and a fine of RM 5,000, and provides no exemption for government officials.

We urge the Sarawakian electorate to hold accountable Caretaker CM Taib Mahmud on denying the entry of Wong, Ng, Kua, Rasiah, Gabriel, Tan and the likes. Is Wong’s advocacy of franchise for Sarawakians and against bribery illegitimate in the eyes of Taib Mahmud?

The Sarawakian electorate should condemn Taib’s abuse of power, which has damaged Sarawak’s legitimacy in maintaining its immigration control. This power was meant in the 18-point agreement to protect Sarawak from undesirable transmigration from West Malaysia and Sabah.

Endorsed by:
1. Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections 2.0 (BERSIH 2.0)

2. Bar Council Malaysia

3. Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF)

4. Muslim Professional Forum (MPF)

5. Kong Min School Old Pupils’ Association

6. Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (KLSCAH)

7. Lawyers for Liberty (LfL)

8. LLG Cultural Development Centre

9. Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM)

10. Negeri Sembilan Chinese Assembly Hall

11. Penang Chinese Independent Schools Education Society

12. Persatuan Alumni Han Chiang, Pulau Pinang

13. Persatuan Alumni Han Chiang Malaysia

14. Persatuan Kelab Kawan Pulau Pinang (Lao Yew Lian Ye Hui)

15. Pusat Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER)

16. Research for Social Advancement (REFSA)

17. Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)

18. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)

19. The Micah Mandate

20. Community Action Network (CAN)

21. Kumpulan Anak Muda Independen (KAMI)

22. Kolektif LimaPulohB

Memorandum: Global Day of Action on Military Spending

Memorandum to the Malaysian Defence Minister

By Malaysian NGOs on the Global Day of Action on Military Spending,

April 12, 2011

In 2009 alone, global military spending rose to an all-time high amount of $1.53 TRILLION! Because we encounter countless crises in today’s world -poverty, hunger, lack of education, poor health care, and environmental issues – it is essential that we come together and create a global movement focusing on what IS important: human lives and their needs. It really is up to us… if not, then who? But we must act NOW!

A Global Day of Action on Military Spending on April 12, 2011 has been organized to coincide with the release of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute’s (SIPRI) new annual figures on world military expenditures. On this day, people on all continents will join together in joint actions to focus public, political, and media attention on the costs of military spending and the need for new priorities. Such events will help us to build the international network around this issue.

Join us in this historic Global Day of Action on Military Spending. This day of action has been coordinated by:

The International Peace Bureau (IPB), dedicated to the vision of a World without War. IPB are a Nobel Peace Laureate (1910); over the years, 13 of its officers have been recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize. They have 320 member organisations in 70 countries, together with individual members from a global network, bring together expertise and campaigning experience in a common cause. Their current main programme centres on Sustainable Disarmament for Sustainable Development.

The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) is a community of public scholars and organizers linking peace, justice, and the environment in the U.S. and globally. They work with social movements to promote true democracy and challenge concentrated wealth, corporate influence, and military power. As Washington’s first progressive multi-issue think tank, the IPS has served as a policy and research resource for visionary social justice movements for over four decades.

Statement by Malaysian NGOs on Military Spending, 12 April 2011

Malaysian NGOs on Military Spending are concerned about the carte blanche given to the Ministry of Defence for arms purchases while health, education and other social services are still so deplorable. The total security allocation under the Tenth Malaysia Plan is RM23 billion. Through the years, the allocation for security (internal security + defence) has been as high as 15.9% and 15.0% under the 3rd and 6th Malaysia Plans while the allocation for health has been as low as 1.6% and 1.0% under the 4th and 5th Malaysia Plans respectively. The Education Minister said recently that 600 schools in the country are in critical condition, most of these in East Malaysia.

The arms race among the Southeast Asian countries seems the most pointless after all the talk at conferences on ASEAN integration. Even so, each country’s attempt to be ahead in the race is self-defeating.

In 1997, Malaysia was described as one of “East Asia’s Big Eight” countries devoting “lavish resources” to develop its military industries. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists said that these countries – China, Japan, Taiwan,Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia – were enhancing their capabilities in military organization, arms purchases, and military industrialization.

Malaysia’s rivalry with Singapore springs not from ideological differences but from the latter’s forced separation from the Malaysian federation in 1965, after a crisis emanating from the racial politics of their ruling classes. From this rivalry we can see how the ensuing arms race has burdened the peoples in the two countries with billions in arms spending.

Many are not aware of the rapid growth of Malaysia’s domestic military-industrial complex. The top brass of the military guard their power and privilege and this is nourished by easy access to the defence budget and the simple justification of “national security”. Today we have seen the growth of such a complex in many countries, including Malaysia. An offshoot of the arms purchases is the race to develop domestic defence equipment industries in each of the S.E. Asian countries.

It is clear that the BN Government could get away with such huge defence budgets during the last few decades because of the erosion of these safeguards in our democratic system, viz. dominance of the executive over parliament; loss of public accountability; absence of Freedom of Information legislation; inadequate separation of powers between the executive and the judiciary; poor safeguards for civil rights. The National Defence Policy is as good as giving a carte blanche to the Ministry of Defence for “deterrence and forward defence”.

The Non-Aligned Movement was founded upon the principles of peace, neutrality and impartiality to the Superpowers. A genuine non-aligned policy can therefore go a long way toward ridding us of the need to procure expensive arms.

Disarmament must ultimately be inclusive of all the nations within ASEAN. The peoples in ASEAN deserve a better quality of life compared to the status quo which is committed to an irrational arms race among the ASEAN countriesthemselves and deprives their peoples of valuable resources for social development.

Minimising the defence budget in Malaysia and throughout ASEAN can free more valuable resources into urgently needed social services and socially useful production. Wasting money on arms prevents it from being spent on health, education, clean water or other public services. It also distorts the economy and diverts resources, such as skilled labour and R&D away from alternative economic activity.

Leaders have the responsibility to initiate that fundamental change and involving everyone in that peace-building process. It involves overcoming the fears, prejudices and other contradictions that give rise to misunderstanding, violence and conflict. It involves re-ordering our financial priorities away from wasteful and destructive arms to the social well-being of all our peoples.

Facilitating greater democracy in our society also creates a culture of peace since the more that citizens have the opportunity to participate in the running of their society and the freedom to express their aspirations and criticisms, the less likely are they to take up arms to overthrow the government.

To achieve a culture of peace would require a profound reformation but reform we must. Cooperating in shared goals and nurturing positive interdependence can help to build this culture of peace. A culture of peace should be our nation’s vision. It is a vision that is only attainable in a society that respects human dignity, social justice, democracy and human rights. It is an environment that can settle conflict and differences through dialogue and democracy and not through threats and repression.

Social change will only happen when the people are mobilised in a movement for peace. Only such a movement and consciousness can divert the billions spent on unnecessary and wasteful armaments to peaceful and socially useful production. Malaysian NGOs on Military Spending have a responsibility for initiating this movement.


1. Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)

2. Kuala Lumpur Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (KLSCAH)

3. Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)

4. Food Not Boms (FNB)

5. Parti Socialis Malaysia (PSM)

6. Community Action Network (CAN)

7. Pusat Komunikasi Masyarakat (KOMAS)

8. Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas (JERIT)

9. Pusat Kesedaran Kommuniti Selangor (EMPOWER)

10. All Women Action Society (AWAM)

11. Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor & WilayaH Persekutuan (PERMAS)

12. Centre for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC)

13. Malaysia Youth & Students Democratic Movement (DEMA)

14. Child Development Initiative

15. Group of Concerned Citizens

16. Ikatan Hak Rakyat

17. Johor Tamizhar Sangam

18. Klang Consumer Association

19. Malaysian Dravidian Association

20. Malaysian Indian Business Association

21. Malaysian Indian Development & Unity Association

22. Nationwide Human Development And Research Centre

23. People Service Organization

24. Persahabatan Semparuthi

25. Persatuan Kemajuan Pendidikan Malaysia

26. Persatuan Prihatin Belia Malaysia

View Larger Map

Home Ministry to embark comprehensive investigation on the cause(s) of the incident.

Press Statement: 6 April 2011

Home Ministry to embark comprehensive investigation on the cause(s) of the incident.

Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) urges the government, in particular, the Home Ministry to embark on comprehensive investigation on the cause(s) of the riot and detainees’ escape from the Lenggeng Detention Centre on 4th April, 2011.

According to the statement made by the Deputy Police Chief Datuk Abdul Manan Mohd. Hassan, investigations showed that the indefinite detention period, overcrowding and poor immigration management, including dissatisfaction with the food provisions were among the root causes. Also, it was stated that some of the escapees had lost patience in waiting to be resettled to a third country by United Nations of High Commissioner of Refugees (UNHCR).

SUARAM believes that there may be other contributing factors as to why the detainees had set the building on fire and escaped from the detention centre.

According to a joint investigation by SUARAM, TENAGANITA and Bar Council on a similar fire incident at the same detention centre on 21st April 2008, the abuse of power and physical abuse by Immigration officers and People’s Volunteer Corps (RELA) were the main reasons for the incident. Amongst other reasons were cramped living conditions, unhygienic living conditions, prolonged and indefinite detention periods and outbreak of diseases.

Based on the report published by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) which was released last February, similar problems such as abuse of power, overcrowding, poor sanitation and unhygienic conditions, and indefinite detention periods are still prevalent in many Malaysian immigration detention centres. The working group visited Malaysia on its country mission from 7 to 17 June 2010.

This latest incident, which involved 109 detainees who set the building on fire and escaped from the Lenggeng Detention centre, proves that the problems highlighted by the WGAD are still occurring.

SUARAM urges the government, especially the Home Ministry to initiate a comprehensive and transparent investigation on the incident and to act on the recommendations by NGOs and the WGAD in order to ensure that detention centres are managed in line with international human rights principles. SUARAM also urges the government to investigate previous allegations of human rights violations and abuse of power by related authorities in detention centres.

SUARAM also urges the Immigration Department to immediately provide asylum seekers access to the UNHCR and to allow the UNHCR to process their asylum claims. Upon verification of their asylum claims, the Government must immediately release the asylum seekers into the UNHCR’s official care.

SUARAM strongly urges calls on the Human Rights Commission on Malaysia (SUHAKAM) to conduct an independent and open inquiry into the incident.

SUARAM further urges the government to accede both the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol to recognize and establish a domestic act to protect refugees and asylum-seekers in Malaysia.

Released by,

Andika Ab. Wahab